Voting
Rights of 1965
The
2013 political cartoon by David Horsey from the newspaper Los Angeles Times shows a newspaper article in the back titled,
“Supreme Court Guts Voting Rights Act,” and a man wearing a ‘State Official’
pin holding out his hand to a trash can while telling a Black man to drop his
ballot in it. This takes us back to the
Civil Rights, Jim Crow, and slave eras.
The cartoon’s context shows how African Americans living in the south are
unfairly treated and being stripped of their rights by Supreme Court taking out
important pieces of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Horsey connects the
history of African Americans in the South to what it’s like now in present
time.
In
order to first understand the cartoon, a person must know United States and
African American history. According to
the Congress of Racial Equality web page, African Americans after
Reconstruction faced difficulties with voting even after the Voting Right of
1965 had given them the right to vote. In order to vote, the Southern blacks
went through all sorts of physical violence and harassment, therefore, the
percentage of registered black voters was low.
Not only did they face negative reactions from the Southern whites, they
faced obstacles such as poll taxes and literacy tests (“Voting”).
Horsey uses symbols in different ways. One way he uses them is to show the setting
of the cartoon, which is indicated by the stars and stripes table cloth, and
the word “boy” in the speech bubble.
Both symbols set us back to a place and time, which is back to the United States
in the slave era. They are minor
symbols, but are needed to know when and where the cartoon takes place. Another way Horsey uses symbols is to help
decipher the cartoon into words. One of
them is a star on a southern hat worn by a creepy looking man, symbolizing that
he is a sheriff. The star is an
important symbol because it is needed to show the systematic denial of voting
rights to the African Americans in the south.
Not
only are symbols in the cartoon important, Horsey’s use of exaggeration also helps
viewers determine the cartoon’s meaning.
He exaggerates that man’s face with the star on his hat making him
appear as if he is evil and up to no good.
This exaggeration suggests that the men in the back are supposed to be
trained to fight for justice and enforce the law, but in the cartoon they are
the ones gutting the rights of the African Americans.
Although
the cartoon may lack features such as iconography, visual irony, caricature,
and captions, Horsey sends his message out by using exaggeration of facial
features and using symbols. He is able
to point out and suggest the unfairness towards African Americans in the
southern states and who the top contributors are. He shows what is wrong with the systematic
denial of voting rights in the southern state towards African Americans. Horsey relies on the exaggeration and symbols
of his cartoon as key points to understanding his drawing.
Work
Cited
"Voting
Rights Act of 1965." Voting Rights Act of 1965. Congress of Racial
Equality, 3 Dec. 2010. Web. 13 Oct. 2013.
I agree that the artist of this cartoon does get his message across by using exaggeration and symbols. I really liked how you explained the cartoon in a way that I could understand.
ReplyDeleteI like your explanation of the cartoon! I didn't understand it very well until i read your paper. You explained the context of the cartoon well!
ReplyDeleteI hadn't even noticed the sheriff in the window until I read your essay! I agree with your assessment that this represents the "systematic denial of voting rights to the African Americans in the south." It definitely makes you wonder just how much of this is going on behind the scenes, which is probably what Horsey wanted to draw our attention to.
ReplyDelete